Emloyment Law Group - Law Firms - Whistleblower Lawyers
Live Chat Contact Us 24/7 Email US
Contact Us: Live Chat, Call, Email Chat email



Use of this form does not establish an attorney-client relationship. As a next
step, you will hear from a client specialist.



Our Clients in Their
Own Words
Play Video: Whistleblower Attorney Testimonials | Wendell Carter
Previous Video
Next Video
THE EMPLOYMENT LAW GROUP®

Toll Free: 1-888-826-5260
Fax: 202-261-2835

inquiry@employmentlawgroup.com

Employment Law Group Addresses
The Employment Law Group,PC. BBB Business Review

Article Summary

Appellate courts are deeply split on how to apply Rule 9(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which requires “particularity” in allegations of fraud, to whistleblower suits brought under the False Claims Act. Some circuits have allowed the defense bar to use Rule 9(b) strike down worthy FCA claims, foreclosing opportunities for taxpayers to recover millions, or even billions, of dollars lost to fraud. The Supreme Court seems eager resolve this debate — if only the Solicitor General will back a suitable test case.

This expert analysis by TELG managing principal R. Scott Oswald was published by Law360 on September 3, 2014. The full article is . (Site requires paid subscription.)

Excerpted from:

The Glass Slipper: Searching For The FCA Case That Fits

Imagine an employee of a government contracting firm sees her company engaged in all manner of potentially fraudulent conduct. She believes that management routinely inflates employee labor hours or that the company has knowingly failed to meet the requisite safety standards for its products. Perhaps the employee works in health care and is aware of an off-label marketing scheme or that physicians in a practice routinely engage in upcoding.

The employee knows that a false claim exists but lacks access to the underlying contracts, invoices, purchase orders or other documentation to specifically identify the proverbial “who, what, when, where and how” associated with the fraud. While I am sensitive to the heightened pleading requirements of Rule 9(b) and certainly believe that frivolous allegations of fraud should be dismissed, the requirements that some courts are imposing upon would-be relators are jeopardizing the government’s anti-fraud enforcement efforts. Specifically, by demanding that a relator meet such a strict "particularity" pleading standard, fraudulent invoices from unscrupulous contractors will continue to fall through the cracks.

greybar
blueline
facebook logo twitter logo google plus logo
Home  |  What We Do  |  Our Team  |  Our Clients  |  In The News  |  Resources  |  Contact Us


Our Locations: Washington, D.C. | San Francisco | Los Angeles

© 2017 The Employment Law Group, P.C. - All rights reserved.
Disclaimer | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy