Emloyment Law Group - Law Firms - Whistleblower Lawyers
Live Chat Contact Us 24/7 Email US
Contact Us: Live Chat, Call, Email Chat email

Use of this form does not establish an attorney-client relationship. As a next
step, you will hear from a client specialist.

Our Clients in Their
Own Words
Play Video: Whistleblower Attorney Testimonials | Wendell Carter
Previous Video
Next Video

Toll Free: 1-888-826-5260
Fax: 202-261-2835


888 17th Street, NW
9th Floor
Washington, DC 20006

The Employment Law Group,PC. BBB Business Review

Date: August 20, 2018

The Washington Post interviewed TELG's Scott Oswald about President Trump's intention to revoke the security clearance of former CIA director John Brennan. Scott said such a revocation could be challenged because the president had acknowledged that his motivation for the action was "totally political."

"If there’s ever a case that would represent an exception, it’s this one.”

R. Scott Oswald

» View on The Washington Post


“Revoking” a security clearance is not as simple as Trump made it sound. Battles could play out for years, lawyers say.

Former CIA director John Brennan said Sunday that he’s considering “going to court” to challenge President Trump’s decision to strip him of his security clearance. If he does, plenty of lawyers with expertise in security clearance cases stand ready to help him.

“There’s a ton of us who would do it pro bono,” Mark Zaid, one of the nation’s leading litigators in the field, told The Washington Post on Sunday night.

“I’d be privileged to have him as a client,” said R. Scott Oswald, who specializes in defending whistleblowers at The Employment Law Group.

But none of the attorneys interviewed by The Washington Post in the wake of Brennan’s comments were confident that Brennan, or any of the other officials and former officials threatened by Trump, would prevail in the end.

The deference the courts have traditionally shown the president in matters of national security presents a formidable obstacle, they said, citing in particular a 1988 ruling by the Supreme Court in Department of the Navy v. Egan, in which the justices said, in Zaid’s words, that judges “don’t have the expertise” to adjudicate clearances and “should not be trying to insert” themselves in the process.

Charles McCullough III, a partner in the Compass Rose Legal Group and former inspector general for the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, called the prospects in court “quite slim.”

But that doesn’t mean there won’t be battles.

“If there’s ever a case that would represent an exception,” Oswald said, “it’s this one.”

» View on The Washington Post

facebook logo twitter logo
Home  |  What We Do  |  Our Team  |  Our Clients  |  In The News  |  Resources  |  Contact Us

Our Location: Washington, D.C.

© 2020 The Employment Law Group, P.C. - All rights reserved.
Disclaimer | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy