Do you suspect that you were denied tenure because of discrimination or retaliation? You’ll want to keep an eye out for warning signs of discrimination and relevant evidence you can gather regarding your tenure decision. If you want to pursue a lawsuit, it’s important to also be aware of the strict deadlines that apply. An employment attorney can help evaluate your circumstances and determine whether to legally challenge the decision.
This article by
TELG principal Adam Augustine Carter and TELG associate Ethan McSweeny was published by The Employment Law Group, P.C. on September 10, 2026.
Denied Tenure? How to Tell Whether Discrimination or Retaliation Played a Role
By Adam Augustine Carter and Ethan McSweeny
IMPORTANT: The following article is intended as a general summary of facts and law and not as individual legal advice upon which you should rely or act. Every case is unique and specific. This article represents our firm’s best knowledge as of September 2026.
Achieving tenure is one of the most significant milestones in an academic career. Colleges and universities generally have considerable discretion to evaluate a candidate’s research, teaching, service, and other qualifications. If tenure is denied based on merit, there’s probably no basis for challenging the decision.
However, a seemingly unfair denial may lead you to wonder if other considerations, such as bias or retaliation rather than merit, may be at play. If you’ve been denied tenure — or have been warned that your tenure application is unlikely to succeed — certain warning signs can help you determine whether the decision may be biased and what you can do about it.
How Can I Tell Whether My Tenure Denial Was Discriminatory?
A primary indicator of discrimination is that the unsuccessful tenure candidate has the same merits in terms of research, experience, teaching, or service but differs from the successful candidate by identifying with or belonging to a different class or demographic group than those granted tenure.
A “protected class” — also known as a “protected category” — is a group of people with a common characteristic who are legally protected from employment discrimination on the basis of that characteristic. Federal employment laws prohibit discrimination based on characteristics including but not limited to:
- Race
- Religion
- Gender identity
- Sexual orientation
- Disability
- National Origin
- Age (for workers age 40 and older)
State and local laws may protect additional characteristics such as marital status, political affiliation, and source of income.
Being a member of a protected group does not, by itself, establish that your tenure denial was discriminatory. There would need to be evidence that your protected characteristic played a role in the decision.
Were Similar Tenure Candidates Treated Differently?
Comparing your record with those of successful tenure candidates can help uncover possible discrimination. You will want to look at how you might be the same as the successful candidates to then determine what might have been the difference that resulted in their success and your denial.
In other words: Who is your comparator?
In employment discrimination cases, a person in a similar position who was treated more favorably is called a “comparator.” In a tenure case, that might be another professor in the same department who was considered for tenure at roughly the same time and had similar qualifications, experience, and professional achievements. Keep in mind that no two academic careers are identical, so a comparison will never be perfect.
Consider questions such as:
- Did another candidate with comparable qualifications receive tenure?
- Were your research, teaching, or service evaluated more harshly?
- Were standards applied to you that were not applied to other candidates?
- Were weaknesses overlooked for successful candidates but emphasized in your case?
- Do the candidates receiving tenure differ from you in race, sex, age, or another protected characteristic?
Comparators help provide evidence that the decision to award tenure was based on an unfair or unlawful basis. If the only difference between you and the successful candidates is gender, for example, you could argue that your gender was the reason you were denied tenure.
Recent tenure decisions within the same department are particularly useful. A comparison to an academic granted tenure within the last five years is of much greater weight than a comparison to a successful applicant more than 10 years ago.
How Do I Investigate My Tenure Decision When the Information Is Confidential?
Tenure decisions can be difficult to investigate because deliberations, votes, and other information are often confidential. A tenure denial letter may not explain everything that happened behind the scenes.
Start by talking to the people you already know. Colleagues, mentors, and others familiar with the process may know how your candidacy was viewed or where opposition developed.
If you can gauge who might have been in your corner, you can reach out to them to find out if they came across any evidence of discrimination. Someone who participated in the process may have witnessed comments or conduct suggesting that improper considerations affected the decision.
The secrecy surrounding tenure decisions, however, may mean that court-ordered discovery is the only way to uncover what was behind the decision.
It is recommended to retain your own counsel if you want to pursue legal routes to obtain information. University counsel and human resources personnel are loyal to the institution and not to individual faculty members, so they may not be looking out for your interests.
What Evidence Should I Collect if I Want to Pursue a Discrimination Case?
Observations of Biased Comments or Actions
Comments and conduct can be important evidence when they suggest that someone involved in the tenure decision held a bias against a legally protected group. Attorneys call this bias or “animus.” Animus is any negative or hostile opinion about a person or group of individuals that can affect one’s ability to remain neutral in a decision involving people belonging to that group.
Evidence of animus can demonstrate that the decision-maker behind your tenure denial had a preferred outcome regardless of your merits. Let’s say you’re a woman, and you find out that someone involved in your tenure denial said that men are easier to work with. They then supported a comparable male candidate over you. The decision-maker’s expressed preference for male colleagues could be evidence that bias was the deciding factor in their support.
The evidence doesn’t have to be direct or explicit. Euphemisms, inconsiderate and disrespectful remarks, coded language, or noticeably different treatment may become relevant when considered with other evidence. Perhaps you’re Jewish, and you notice that someone who was involved in your tenure decision tends to get more frustrated when you take time off for religious holidays but doesn’t act the same way when your Christian co-workers take time off.
If something concerning occurs, document it while your memory is fresh. Try to be as exact and detailed as possible. You can send an email to yourself using your private email account and record:
- What was said or done;
- Who said or did it;
- When and where it happened;
- Who else witnessed it; and
- How it might relate to your tenure candidacy.
Information Indicating Discrimination in Previous Personnel Decisions
Previous personnel decisions can establish a pattern where bias can be inferred. Look backward to see if the same person who denied your tenure has a history of denying people in your legally protected class. This can extend further than just tenure decisions. You’ll want to look at hiring and promotional decisions as well.
Ideally, you’d be able to compare multiple personnel decisions made by the same person regarding the same candidate. For example, a man hires a woman, knowing that she is a woman, and then that same man denies that woman tenure. This example can lead to the inference that bias wasn’t the motivating factor because the man had no issue hiring her in the first place. In legal terms, this is known as the “same actor inference.”
On the other hand, let’s say the female candidate was hired by a woman instead. The female candidate was later denied tenure by a man who historically tended to hire, promote, and/or approve tenure for mostly men. That can be an indicator of bias.
This is not to say that it is impossible for the person who hired you to later discriminate against you for a promotional or tenure decision. However, it can be more difficult to argue that you were denied tenure because of your protected class.
Documentation Related to Your Tenure or Job Performance
Records created at different stages of the tenure process may also become important. Keep copies of materials available to you, including:
- Tenure policies and written evaluation criteria;
- Your tenure application and supporting materials;
- Performance reviews and prior evaluations;
- Emails and other communications about your candidacy;
- Written decisions or recommendations made during the tenure process; and
- Any other information you lawfully possess concerning other tenure decisions.
Note the use of the words “lawfully possess.” Evidence gathering is not an acceptable excuse for digging into files that you don’t already have a right to access. Stick to keeping copies of documents that you come across in the natural course of your job and that do not contain confidential information that doesn’t pertain to you.
Keep the records you’ve gathered in a location you can access without relying on your employer’s systems.
How Can I Prove That Being Denied Tenure Harmed Me?
Harm is a necessary aspect of a discrimination claim. Simply being denied tenure is insufficient for a successful claim; you must also prove that you have suffered damage as a result of the denial. A discriminatory tenure denial can cause economic, reputational, and emotional harm.
Economic Harm
Being denied tenure typically means the end of a candidate’s time with that university (although they may be granted a “terminal” contract year that’ll give them time to find another job). The loss of their position also generally means losing income, retirement contributions, health insurance, and other benefits.
Even if they find another job quickly, there may be a significant difference in what they earn at their new job versus what they would’ve earned in the tenured position. This loss of potential earnings can also be considered economic harm.
Pay records, benefits statements, employment contracts, and information about the compensation associated with the tenured position can help document these losses.
Reputational Harm
The economic harm a person experiences can be exacerbated by reputational harm, which may make finding another job difficult. A tenure denial can be a stain on a professor’s reputation, and it may affect their standing among their peers and impact the opportunities available to them.
For example, a faculty member who previously received regular invitations to speak at conferences might receive significantly fewer invitations after the denial. Other evidence of reputational harm could include unsuccessful job applications, fewer invitations to consult or publish academic pieces, or testimony from colleagues about changes in the professor’s professional standing.
Emotional Harm
A discriminatory tenure denial also may cause anxiety, depression, or other emotional distress. Evidence of emotional harm may include the professor’s own testimony, testimony from family members or others who have observed changes in their mental and physical health, or records and testimony from a therapist or other health care provider.
You may be able to receive monetary compensation or remedies — such as back pay, reinstatement, or damages — depending on the law involved and the circumstances of your case.
Can Denial of Tenure Be Retaliation?
Yes, tenure denial might be retaliation if your situation involves three elements:
- Protected activity: Many employment laws forbid employer retaliation against workers who engage in legally protected activity. This can include refusing to follow orders that would constitute violating the law, participating in an investigation into illegal behavior, or complaining about unlawful discrimination in your workplace.
- Adverse employment action: There was an action taken against you that negatively impacted your job or your work conditions. Retaliatory acts can take many forms, including denial of tenure, unfairly low performance evaluations, transfers to less desirable positions, or termination.
- Connection between the protected activity and the adverse action: Your employer took an adverse action against you because of your protected activity. Employers will rarely make it explicit that they’re retaliating against you, but behavior or statements indicating your employer is upset about the protected activity may be enough proof. A short period of time between your protected activity and an adverse action can also indicate retaliation. It’s suspicious if you’re denied tenure only days after reporting discrimination, and it is even more suspicious if up to that point in time you were on track to get tenure.
What’s the Deadline for Filing a Discrimination or Retaliation Lawsuit?
The deadline for filing a claim depends on the law. Claims under federal laws — such as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act and the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act — generally require employees to file a charge with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) within 180 days of the alleged discrimination. There are some exceptions that may extend the deadline to 300 days, depending on local laws or the type of discrimination.
You may consider filing an internal grievance with your employer as well, but it’s important to know that the clock does not stop for an internal appeals process. The U.S. Supreme Court has held that the countdown for filing a claim starts at the time that the tenure candidate is officially notified of the tenure denial. For example, let’s say that the president of your university has to give a stamp of approval on the tenure decision, but you learned of the decision when the provost previously made their determination. The deadline for filing a claim is then based on the day you learned of the provost’s decision.
For that reason, consider speaking with an employment attorney as soon as your tenure is denied at any level so that your lawyer can help you prepare and file your claim in a timely manner.
Do I Need a Lawyer to Combat My Tenure Denial?
An attorney who specializes in representing plaintiffs and is experienced in higher education cases can guide you through the process of challenging tenure denial.
There are potential risks and rewards for any case. Litigation can be costly and time-consuming, and a weak case sometimes does more harm than good when it comes to reputation. An attorney can evaluate your case and let you know what your options are, whether you have enough evidence to pursue a legal case, and how you may be able to strengthen it.
If you suspect you were denied tenure for discriminatory or retaliatory reasons, contact The Employment Law Group to speak with an experienced attorney.
———-
Adam Augustine Carter is a principal at The Employment Law Group, P.C.; Ethan McSweeny is an associate at the firm.
