Jackson v. Edgewood Management Corp.

DISCLAIMER: Our firm's past results do not predict or guarantee future success. Each case is unique. Read more

In Brief

TELG client Donna Jackson won $650,000 in a case that extended “cat’s paw” liability to workplace retaliation cases filed under Maryland state law.

What Happened in Court

Maryland’s highest court upheld a jury’s award of $650,000 to TELG client Donna Jackson, who had faced retaliation after passing along a gender discrimination complaint aimed at her supervisor. The outcome solidified Maryland’s adoption of the “cat’s paw” concept of liability, under which an employer may be held liable for retaliation against an employee even if the actual decision-maker was unaware of a retaliatory motive. The case was Maryland’s first major application of Staub v. Proctor Hospital, the landmark 2011 “cat’s paw” decision by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Attorneys In This Case

Nicholas Woodfield
Nicholas Woodfield

R. Scott Oswald
R. Scott Oswald

Speaking Engagements

The Substantial Jury Verdict and the Appeal in the Edgewood Management Corporation v. Donna Jackson Case, Metropolitan Washington Employment Lawyers Association (MWELA), Sep-2013

Related Practice Areas:

Related court documents:

Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Amend Judgment
Circuit Court for Mongomery County, Maryland
Jackson v. Edgewood Management: Original Complaint
Circuit Court for Mongomery County, Maryland
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland