By Anita Mazumdar Chambers

---

IMPORTANT: The following article is intended as a general summary of facts and law and not as individual legal advice upon which you should rely or act. Every case is unique and specific. This article represents our firm’s best knowledge as of April 2026.

---

Many laws protect U.S. employees against discrimination, retaliation, and other workplace wrongs. But a lot of these statutes, including Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, for example, totally exclude up to 15 percent of the workforce: Independent contractors, who don’t qualify as “employees” under the law.

Are you an independent contractor? And if you are, what laws protect you against unfair treatment at work? The short answer is that you still have rights via a patchwork of federal laws, contract law, tort law, and — depending on where you live and work — some potentially powerful state laws.

This article provides an overview of the legal protections that are available to independent contractors who face unjust actions at work. As always, your individual situation is best assessed by an employment attorney.

Am I an Independent Contractor?

First things first: Are you truly an independent contractor? It’s not always easy to tell.

If your pay is reportable to the U.S. Internal Revenue Service via a 1099 form, that’s a sign that the company or person who paid you believes you’re an independent contractor. By contrast, employees generally get W2 tax forms. But your payer/employer may be wrong — and even if you’re an independent contractor under tax law, that doesn’t necessarily mean you’re an independent contractor for other legal purposes.

The definition of “independent contractor” vs. “employee” varies from law to law, state to state, and even among federal agencies. There are a few common principles, however, which can be weighed differently depending on context:

1. The degree of control an employer has over how work is completed. In general, if you control most of the decisions, you are more likely to be an independent contractor.
2. The method of payment. If you are paid a fixed amount for a service, rather than getting an hourly wage or salary throughout the year, you are more likely to be an independent contractor.
3. The degree of independence or separation you maintain from the employer: If you wear your own clothes, use your own tools, and keep your own hours, for example, you are more likely to be an independent contractor.
4. The length and depth of your “employment” relationship — the less you rely on a single job for your income, the more likely you are an independent contractor.
5. And finally, whether you get any benefits like 401(k) plans, paid vacation, or health insurance. If you don’t get any of these, you may appropriately be an independent contractor.

None of this is dispositive, however, and there are other factors that may change the analysis. In the end, only a court can definitively say whether any individual person is an employee or an independent contractor for the purpose of a specific law.

Still, for argument’s sake, let’s say that you’re probably an independent contractor — otherwise, why would you be reading this? What rights do you have?

Let’s look at them, category by category.

Federal Laws That Protect Independent Contractors

Most of the well-known federal workplace statutes — including Title VII, the Family and Medical Leave Act, the Fair Labor Standards Act, the American with Disabilities Act, and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act — either don’t apply to independent contractors or offer meager protections to them. However, there are some exceptions and some creative approaches.

Section 1981 of the 1866 Civil Rights Act: This isn’t a workplace law, as such, but it works as one. It provides that “all persons … shall have the same right to make and enforce contracts … as is enjoyed by white citizens.” Section 1981 allows independent contractors to sue an employer for treating them differently because of their race or national origin. It isn’t as wide-ranging as Title VII; it doesn’t address sex or religious discrimination, for instance. Still, it offers some basic protections.

Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act: The ADA’s main employment provision excludes independent contractors. But Title III of the ADA states that “no individual shall be discriminated against on the basis of disability in the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, advantages, or accommodations of any place of public accommodation.” At a glance, this protects mainly customers of businesses that serve the public. But some independent contractors, such as contracting physicians at medical facilities, have used Title III to file suit against their place of employment. As an example, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has held that a doctor “who is not an employee for purposes of Title I” of the ADA still could win under Title III for a hospital’s suspension of his privileges after he revealed that he’d been diagnosed with attention deficit disorder.

Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act: The Rehab Act is a law that’s mostly parallel to the ADA but that applies to the federal government. Section 504 prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in access to any program that receives federal funding. Some prominent courts have held that this allows independent contractors to sue federal contractors for discrimination. As an example, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled that a company that provided medical services to the U.S. Air Force could be held liable for refusing to provide a reasonable accommodation to a contract physician.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act: Known as SOX, this law protects workers, including independent contractors, from retaliation for blowing the whistle on public companies that they believe have violated securities laws. The U.S. Supreme Court famously held that SOX would protect even a babysitter paid by the executive of a company covered by the law, if the babysitter were to report fraud. Still, SOX isn’t an all-purpose law against retaliation: It applies only to specific instances of whistleblowing about specific wrongdoing. But it’s a rarity among federal laws in its equal protection of employees and contractors.

The False Claims Act: The FCA incentivizes people to report fraud against the U.S. government — and it protects whistleblowers, including independent contractors, who suffer a negative employment action for exercising their rights under the FCA, which can include making purely internal reports about relevant wrongdoing. Like SOX, the FCA applies only to specific employers. If you perform work for a company that accepts federal funds, however, it could provide you with a useful legal tool. Indeed, the FCA’s anti-retaliation provision may suddenly be more powerful now that the U.S. government has loudly declared that FCA liability can attach to “disparate treatment based on race or ethnicity in the recruitment, employment (e.g., hiring, promotions), contracting (e.g., vendor agreements), program participation, or allocation or deployment of an entity’s resources.” Retaliation for reporting such discrimination may be found illegal under the statute.

State Laws That Protect Independent Contractors

Independent contractors may have greater protections under state law than under federal law. If you face discrimination or retaliation, therefore, a state court could be where you may find relief. Along with Washington, D.C., at least four states — Maryland, Minnesota, New York, and Rhode Island — broadly protect independent contractors against workplace bias, while at least five more states — California, Illinois, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Washington — offer good protection within certain contexts. In other places the situation may be less favorable, less clear, or both. State law is constantly evolving, however, and it’s mostly moving in favor of independent contractors. Meanwhile, some cities and counties are much friendlier than their parent state. New York City affords independent contractors broader protections than does New York State as a whole, for instance. For an up-to-date assessment of your specific circumstances, consult an employment attorney.

As an illustration of how rights can vary between states — and over time — here’s a snapshot of the situation in three jurisdictions around our firm’s home in Washinton, D.C.

Maryland: Since 2019, Maryland’s main anti-discrimination workplace law, the Fair Employment Practices Act, has included “independent contractor” within its definition of “employee.” Maryland independent contractors get full protection against discrimination and retaliation across many characteristics, from race to disability to age to gender identity, effectively filling the gaps left by multiple federal laws.

District of Columbia: The D.C. Human Rights Act always has prohibited a wide range of discriminatory acts by employers, but D.C. courts traditionally read this to require an employer/employee relationship between the parties. Happily, this situation changed in 2022, when the law was amended to cover independent contractors explicitly, taking its interpretation out of judges’ hands.

Virginia: The Virginia Human Rights Act protects “employees” from workplace bias. In their application of the VHRA, state courts have interpreted this to exclude independent contractors. Virginia’s workplace laws have been changing rapidly over recent years, however, so there’s hope for improvement.

Other Protections for Independent Contractors

The law also offers solutions that fall outside the realm of modern anti-discrimination employment statutes. Some practices that are prohibited by Title VII and its brethren have long been illegal under older theories of law, too — especially if the wrongdoing is an egregious form of harassment. Here are some examples.

Tort Law: A tort is a civil wrong — other than a breach of contract — that causes harm, injury, or loss to another person, resulting in legal liability for the person who commits the act (the tortfeasor). It allows injured parties to seek compensation, typically monetary damages, through civil lawsuits. Independent contractors can claim that they’ve suffered a legally recognized harm, or tort, due to the actions of an employer. In the workplace context and depending on the state where you live or work, such tort claims may include: harassment; negligent hiring, retention, or supervision of a discriminator or harasser; and infliction of emotional distress, either intentional or negligent. Although some version of “wrongful discharge” is a tort in most states, it’s generally available only to regular employees.

Contract Law: If you have a written contract or a job description that covers your work for an employer, this document could protect you against some workplace bias. Many contracts or job descriptions contain language that prohibits specific types of discrimination, promises accommodation of disabilities, or makes other potentially enforceable promises about “equal employment opportunity.” If you experience prohibited behavior, you might be able to sue (or enter arbitration) to enforce these contractual rights, just as you’d enforce any contract. In addition, you might be able to claim that an employer violated an “implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing.”

Criminal Law: Finally, some types of workplace wrongdoing may be pursued under criminal laws — most notably, hate crimes and intense sexual harassment. You will need the help of a sympathetic prosecutor.

Conclusion

Independent contractors have fewer legal protections against workplace bias than regular employees do, especially at the federal level. This is an unpleasant truth. If you’re an independent contractor, however, you’re not completely unprotected. State laws can be quite powerful, and some federal laws still may apply. There are other channels, too. To start the process, consult an employment attorney.

—–

Anita Mazumdar Chambers is a principal at The Employment Law Group, P.C., a law firm that represents employees in disputes with their employers.

By Anita Mazumdar Chambers

---

IMPORTANT: The following article is intended as a general summary of facts and law and not as individual legal advice upon which you should rely or act. Every case is unique and specific. This article represents our firm’s best knowledge as of April 2026.

---

Social media is an integral part of our lives, shaping the way we share information and engage with the world. Platforms like Facebook, Instagram, or TikTok offer numerous benefits, but they also present challenges when it comes to navigating the delicate balance between personal and professional lives.

You might believe your social media activity is none of your employer’s business, but that’s not always the case. Information shared online can be easily (and quickly) disseminated to a large audience, but it is also not easily removed if it becomes harmful. Anything you post can have an impact on how people perceive you on a personal and professional level.

Employers may be concerned about how your posts might impact their company’s reputation if people online figure out where you work — which anyone curious enough probably can. But to what extent may employers legally act on this interest?

The only US state that is not an at-will employment state is Montana. This gives employers broad freedom to make decisions about their employees’ jobs. Employment laws then set the boundaries of that freedom — like a fence around a field — by defining what employers cannot do rather than what they can. In other words, an employer’s conduct, including the decision to fire you, is typically not considered illegal unless a law specifically prohibits a particular action.

Various federal and state laws set legal boundaries for how employers can respond to employees’ social media activity. These laws provide certain protections, but employees should also keep other practical considerations in mind before hitting “Post.”

Legal Protections

The First Amendment

People might believe the First Amendment shields them from an employer’s wrath if they are upset about their posts. After all, doesn’t the amendment protect your right to speak freely?

Unfortunately, that mostly only applies if you’re a government employee, as the First Amendment is designed to protect individuals from government censorship. A government employer disciplining an employee for social media activity may raise First Amendment concerns. In contrast, a private employer is not the government, so its decisions — such as terminating an employee, demoting them, or denying them a bonus based on a social media post — typically don’t implicate the First Amendment.

Even government employees, however, are not fully protected by the First Amendment when it comes to workplace speech. The right to free speech is intended to allow people to criticize the government and engage in public debate. Therefore, the First Amendment generally only protects employees speaking on matters of public concern, not employees airing personal grievances.

A 1968 case, Pickering v. Board of Education, helped define what counted as “matters of public concern.” In the case, a teacher sent a letter to a newspaper that criticized how the school board allocated public funds. The court considered the letter protected speech because it addressed an issue of public importance.

The U.S. Supreme Court in Connick v. Myers solidified the Pickering decision. It created a two-step test to determine whether the speech of a public employee is protected: First, the speech must involve a matter of public concern, and second, the employee’s interest in speaking on that matter must outweigh the employer’s interest in maintaining an efficient workplace. The court explained that whether an employees’ speech qualifies as a matter of public concern depends on “the content, form, and context of a given statement.”

In Connick, the court held that an assistant district attorney’s disagreement with her supervisor’s decision to transfer her did not pass the test. The employee’s speech didn’t seek to inform the public of any failure to execute governmental duties or any potential breach of public trust, and thus, was not of “public import” or protected.

State Laws

Some states have laws or statutes that protect both government and private employees from being disciplined for what they do outside of work (as long as they’re not breaking any laws, of course).

The California Labor Code, for example, mandates that employers may not retaliate against employees for engaging in lawful conduct during non-working hours away from the employer’s premises. Similarly, New York’s Legal Activities Law prohibits discrimination against an employee because of their legal recreational activities, assuming the activities occur outside work hours, off the employer’s premises, and without the use of the employer’s equipment or other property. This can include actions such as posting photos from a Pride event, expressing support for a political candidate, or sharing information about one’s salary — activities that may be controversial but are still legal.

Some states don’t have laws that specifically address social media but do have retaliation laws that may apply. Retaliation laws protect employees who engage in “protected conduct,” such as reporting discrimination to human resources or raising concerns about potentially fraudulent or illegal activity. A social media post would have to relate to a potential violation of law or public policy for an employee to pursue a retaliation claim; complaining about a boss online doesn’t fall under “protected conduct.”

The employee would also have to prove that their employer saw the post. To constitute retaliation, an employer must be aware of the potential violation, have an opportunity to address the issue, and then instead choose to take an adverse action, such as demoting or terminating the employee. Social media posts often fall short because they are typically private or not directed at the employer, meaning the employer might never receive notice of any violations. An employee who can show the employer did see their post — because it was shared publicly on LinkedIn, for example, or brought to the employer’s attention — may have a plausible (though challenging) basis for a retaliation claim.

The National Labor Relations Act

Social media posts discussing the terms and conditions of your employment might be protected under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). The NLRA encourages collective bargaining and protects employees’ rights to improve their working conditions, so actions like discussing your salary with colleagues on a Facebook page would likely be protected.

The NLRA’s protections are extensive. In NLRB v. Pier Sixty, LLC, an employee made an obscene and explicit Facebook post that directly attacked his supervisor, but it was protected because the post referenced union activity and was published to coworkers. The court noted that online forums like Facebook are “a key medium of communication among coworkers and a tool for organization in the modern era.”

However, the NLRA does not provide blanket protection for all speech related to the terms and conditions of your employment. Statements discussing confidential or proprietary employer information, for example, would likely not be protected.

Anti-Discrimination Laws and Speech Protections

Let’s say you post an Instagram story about a religious celebration — your employer cannot then demote or fire you for your posts because it might be sharing details about your religion beliefs. They would essentially be punishing you for expressing your protected traits.

There are several factors that can help you build a solid argument that your employer unlawfully discriminated against you based on any protected speech:

• Employer awareness: Can you show that the decision makers behind the adverse action saw or knew about your social media activity?
• Timing: Did the adverse action occur very soon after your social media post, therefore indicating a possible causal link?
• Pattern of behavior: Did your employer take adverse actions against other employees in your protected class for making similar posts? Or, conversely, did your employer not punish employees outside of your protected class, even though they made similar posts?

Factors to Consider Before Posting

There are several laws in place that protect an employee’s right to engage in social media, but that doesn’t mean it’s a free-for-all where employees can do whatever whenever they want. Employers can draw some reasonable boundaries, and there are other considerations employees should keep in mind when deciding how and when to use social media.

Employer Policies

Some employers have policies that govern employees’ conduct on social media, both during and outside of work. These policies can outline when it’s inappropriate to use social media, whether any conduct is prohibited, and what the consequences are if you violate policy.

You generally agree to a company’s policies when you start working for them. Down the road, maybe you post something on social media that violates the policy and results in discipline. You might decide that you disagree with the policy and that your post shouldn’t be prohibited. Changing your mind later doesn’t change the fact that you agreed to the policy in the first place though. It’s more difficult to challenge a disciplinary action that you were warned of (and agreed to).

In most cases, employers don’t have policies that explicitly mention social media use. Instead, they probably have a policy regarding general employee behavior that may reflect on the employer and its values. A policy might state that employees must maintain a professional demeanor and that any behavior that could damage the employer’s reputation could be subject to discipline. Wearing company gear at a white supremacist rally or posting a hate speech comment on the company’s social media page are often legitimate bases for discipline.

Employer Equipment

A lot of employers have rules about what employees can and cannot do while using company-issued devices. Those devices are company property, so employers have a strong (and usually valid) argument that they can control activity on them, regardless of whether it occurs during work hours or in an official capacity.

Employers have some authority to monitor and search employer-issued devices for reprimandable behavior — with certain limits, such as privacy laws, anti-discrimination laws, and any company policies that restrict how monitoring is conducted.

External Professional Regulations

Your profession or industry may have rules that would limit your social media activity, regardless of your employer. Lawyers, for example, are expected to follow professional and ethical rules to maintain their legal licenses. They’re required to keep client communications and information confidential, so posting non-public information about a case would likely jeopardize their legal license. Health professionals are similarly obligated to protect patient information.

Discipline regarding your professional qualifications (such as suspension or disbarment) is handled by a third party, not your employer. However, your employer may impose their own discipline as well. Employers have a valid interest in ensuring their employees follow all professional regulations. It may be reasonable to reprimand you if your social media post raises compliance concerns or risks the business’s reputation for following professional and ethical standards.

Professional v. Social Accounts

Context matters. The platform you post on, the audience who sees your activity, and how you represent yourself online can all influence how your employer reacts to your social media activity. Sharing a picture of you drinking on Facebook is not the same as posting it on LinkedIn.

On LinkedIn, your primary identity is as an employee. You usually have your employer identified, and the purpose of the platform is to network with colleagues and share your professional updates. In contrast, you likely don’t identify your employer on Facebook, and you limit your audience to friends only. Thus, it’s understandable if an employer expects a certain degree of professionalism on LinkedIn but regards Facebook activity as private conduct.

Legal Advice

The legal landscape on how social media intersects with employment law continues to evolve. You may need the help of an experienced employment attorney to help navigate the protections available to you.

If you’ve been punished at work because of a social media post, contact The Employment Law Group today.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Q: I applied to a job but was rejected because of my social media posts. Is that legal?

It depends. Pursuing any employment-based claim when you are not an official employee can be difficult. For some statutes, legally being an employee is a prerequisite to filing a claim.

Most employers also don’t give explanations for rejecting a job application, making it hard to know if you were declined because of your social media activity or to argue that you were rejected on pretext.

That being said, it is not an open-and-shut case. Some statutes explicitly protect applicants from discrimination, such as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.[1] You may have a civil rights claim if you can demonstrate a link between your social media activity and the rejection. However, this would only apply if the employer rejected your application for a discriminatory reason, not if it was because your social media presence didn’t resonate with the employer’s values or reputation.

Q: My employer asked for access to my private social media posts. Are they allowed to do that?

Generally, no, but that doesn’t guarantee they won’t see your private posts regardless.

Your employer generally can’t force you to give them access to your private social media accounts, but they might become aware of your posts through some other means. Perhaps a coworker followed you on social media and shared your posts with your employer, or perhaps you used your personal accounts on company devices and your employer saw it while monitoring activity. It’s in your best interests to keep your work and private lives as separate as possible.

An employer may still discipline you for a post that violates its policies or code of conduct — even if it’s posted on a private account — if they come across it somehow.

Q: I post regularly about my personal hobby on a public social media account, occasionally even during the day. Can my employer fire me for this?

Let’s say you post makeup tutorials on an Instagram page and engage directly with followers about tips and tricks. Maybe you have enough followers that you get sponsored for some of your content. Is this cause for termination?

This mostly depends on the type of job you have and whether your employer has any policies dictating your activity during the workday. Some employers are concerned with whether you’re completing assigned work at the expected level, and so minor personal activity during the workday might be overlooked if the employer concludes that it doesn’t interfere with your productivity. Other employers expect their employees to refrain from any personal activity during the workday. In such situations, an employer can legally assert that making non-work-related posts during the workday is cause for termination. Remember, unless a reason for terminating an employee has been made illegal, it is otherwise legal, regardless of how trivial or arbitrary it might seem to the employee.

The bottom line is to be aware of your company’s policies and ensure your conduct is not in conflict with them.

Q: Can my employer fire or demote me based on what my friends post about me on social media?

Yes, in some circumstances. As with your own social media activity, it depends on what’s posted.

Unfortunately, we don’t have total control over what’s posted on social media, and there are times where we have a social media presence without intending to have one. You might have been at a party where others were taking illegal substances, and someone posted a picture with you in it. Or, you might have a Facebook friend that made vulgar, homophobic posts and tagged you among other random friends to spread the post further.

You weren’t the one engaging in questionable conduct or speech, but your identity comes up in connection with it. Your employer might take issue with being associated — even tangentially — to certain conduct online. Therefore, posts about or related to you can influence your employer’s decisions regarding your employment.

However, the same rules that apply to your own content apply to those of others. Your employer can’t fire or demote you because your friend added you to a Black Lives Matter page, for example. That activity is clearly tied to a protected trait (i.e., race), and it doesn’t matter if you weren’t the one to do it. You would still be able to challenge your employer’s decision on the grounds that it was motivated by discrimination.

———-

[1] Title VII Civil Rights Act § 2000e-2(a)

—–

Anita Mazumdar Chambers is a principal at The Employment Law Group, P.C., a law firm that represents employees in disputes with their employers.

By R. Scott Oswald and Austin Szabo

---

IMPORTANT: The following article is intended as a general summary of facts and law and not as individual legal advice upon which you should rely or act. Every case is unique and specific. This article represents our firm’s best knowledge as of April 2026.

---

Rolled-back regulations may leave you uncertain as to whether the federal government still cares about environmental wrongdoing. The passage of the Inflation Reduction Act in 2022 by the Biden administration brought more focus on climate initiatives, but the Trump administration’s subsequent repeal of some of the initiatives and regulations has created confusion.

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), however, has not changed its stance: Whistleblowers are encouraged to come forward with reports of environmental law violations, including any workplace retaliation. Federal laws may protect you from being fired, demoted, or otherwise punished by your employer for reporting potentially illegal behavior.

OSHA’s framework for reporting violations also remains unchanged and so does the very short statute of limitations: a mere 30 days to contact OSHA or lose your claim (and any legal protections against retaliation).

Do Environmental Laws Protect Whistleblowers From Retaliation?

Six federal laws forbid harming the environment or retaliating against employees who report potential violations in good faith. These laws, which prohibit actions such as illegal dumping and unsafe disposal of toxic materials, are:

• The Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) that addresses the handling of certain chemicals like asbestos or lead-based paint;
• The Clean Air Act (CAA) that regulates the emission of air pollutants;
• The Solid Waste Disposal Act (SWDA) that dictates how waste, such as used oil, should be safely disposed of;
• The Federal Water Pollution Control Act (FWPCA) that is now commonly known as the Clean Water Act (CWA) and aims to restrict water pollution;
• The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) that establishes requirements for hazardous waste sites and cleanups; and
• The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) that determines the quality standards for potable water.

You may expect these laws to fall under the purview of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), but the EPA lacks the necessary power to fight against environmental whistleblower retaliation. Congress has instead given responsibility for nearly all environmental whistleblower laws to OSHA.

Each statute above can provide strong legal protection for whistleblowers — as well as monetary compensation for any harm suffered. Employers are not allowed to retaliate against an employee for reporting violations, but if they do, the employee may have a retaliation claim on their hands.

A whistleblower could request reinstatement to their previous position and receive back pay and compensatory damages if they’ve suffered economic harm (such as lost earnings if they’re fired or demoted) or noneconomic harm (such as emotional distress). Two of the statutes, TSCA and SDWA, go a step further and allow you to ask for punitive damages, which are meant to punish and deter defendants from repeating egregiously illegal behavior.

Luckily for whistleblowers, these statutes have a more relaxed “standard of causation” for retaliation claims than other similar laws, meaning you may have an easier time proving your case and winning. You’re only required to show that your report of unlawful activity was a motivating factor in your employer’s decision to retaliate (as opposed to the more difficult task of proving that the retaliation happened solely because of your report).

How Much Time Do You Have to File a Retaliation Claim?

These are powerful statutes for whistleblowers, but slow and steady does not win this race. Here, the hare wins, meaning you must act fast or lose your claim. OSHA reporting laws have some of the shortest statute of limitations in United States law. The environmental whistleblower laws in particular only give you 30 days to file your retaliation claim.

You should call your local OSHA office as soon as you believe your employer is retaliating against you for whistleblowing. The clock starts ticking once you’ve been notified of an adverse action — even if the action will occur later. Let’s say you’re told on May 1st that you’ll be fired on May 15th. Your 30 days start counting down from when you learn of the upcoming retaliation, so you only have until May 31st to call OSHA.

How Do You File a Whistleblower Retaliation Claim With OSHA?

You can file a complaint with OSHA in person, online, via fax/mail/email, or by telephone.

The best way to file any complaint is in writing and with the help of an attorney, but a 30-day deadline doesn’t always give you time to prepare a written complaint. That deadline only applies to the initial report, however. If the deadline is looming, you can call OSHA now and just give a brief report that will stop the clock and buy you more time to gather documentation afterwards. Typically you need to explain to OSHA how:

1. You engaged in activity that is protected under environmental whistleblower protection laws (preferably mentioning the specific environmental harm you attempted to report or prevent);
2. Your employer knew or suspected that you engaged in protected activity;
3. Your employer took an adverse action against you, such as firing or demoting you; and
4. Your protected activity motivated your employer’s adverse action.

OSHA has field offices all around the country. To report retaliation, you’ll need to contact the correct one for your area. Make sure to closely review the descriptions for your state’s local field offices as there are some exceptions to geographic organization.

Virginia, for example, has a specific office that covers “federal employees; the United States Postal Service; private sector maritime; federal military facilities; and other federal territories where the state has relinquished jurisdiction to the federal government.” If you work in Virginia and fall under any of these categories, then you must call the Norfolk Area Office regardless of whether you work all the way in Abingdon, Virginia. You’ll also want to note that the Norfolk Area Office is not to be confused with the Norfolk State Plan Office.

Another quirk is that the entire Washington, D.C., area shares an OSHA office with Maryland’s federal employees: the Baltimore-Washington DC Area Office.

After you submit your initial report, you will be given a case number and likely a deadline to provide more information and documents for OSHA to investigate your claim.

What Happens After You Call OSHA?

Your initial report to OSHA gets you in the door within the 30-day deadline, but that’s only the beginning of the process. OSHA will begin investigating your claim and will ask if you have more information that may be helpful.

OSHA provides a list of recommended information that can help boost your claim. Examples of helpful information include, but are not limited to:

• Copies of lawfully obtained documents related to your claim, such as emails, meeting notes, or text messages;
• Copies of your termination letter or other disciplinary action(s) you received;
• A list of the management officials who decided to retaliate against you; and
• A list of potential witnesses who can back up your claim.

It’s important to know that your complaint is not anonymous. Your employer or former employer will find out what you filed.

Most of the investigation process, however, is out of your hands. The process is intended to only take 90 days for OSHA to release a decision regarding your claim, but the average wait extends to around 250 days due to chronic budget and staffing shortages at the agency.

You must wait OSHA to complete its investigation before you can proceed to litigation. Claims related to laws under OSHA must be litigated within the agency’s system.

How Can an Attorney Help You Through OSHA’s Process?

Pursuing a retaliation claim can be an arduous process and involve many moving parts. Having an attorney to guide you is ideal. They can stay on top of deadlines and make sure no stones are left unturned during OSHA’s investigation.

There are many documents you can submit to support your claim, but if you’re not careful, you can just as easily harm your case. Do you know which workplace files you’re legally allowed to make personal copies of? Is it a bad idea to record conversations with your boss? The answers to these questions and many more vary depending on the state and your specific job. An attorney would be able to suggest the best steps for you after reviewing the nuances of your situation.

The reality is also that the process may not end with only one investigation. OSHA dismisses most claims, and whistleblowers often have to appeal the decision. The initial dismissal may be disappointing, but the appeals process gives whistleblowers numerous opportunities to prove their case.

You would first file an appeal with an administrative law judge (ALJ). Once again, you’re looking at a tight deadline: within 30 days of OSHA’s decision. The ALJ then schedules a hearing after discovery and a pre-hearing briefing. The ALJ’s decision might not be favorable either, in which case you can appeal to the Administrative Review Board (ARB). The ARB typically makes its decision within 90 days. If you still don’t prevail, you may be able to appeal to a circuit court depending on which environmental law was violated.

Altogether, you have four levels where you can pursue your retaliation claim. This means, however, four different processes with their own unique challenges and best practices. An attorney with significant experience handling administrative whistleblower cases would improve your odds at approaching each stage in the strongest way possible.

Environmental whistleblower laws offer meaningful protections, but those protections come with strict deadlines and a fast-moving process. The most important step is to act quickly if you believe your employer has retaliated against you for reporting environmental violations. File a complaint with OSHA within 30 days to preserve your rights. From there, hire an experienced whistleblower retaliation lawyer to help you build your case and, if necessary, pursue an appeal.

—–

R. Scott Oswald is managing principal of The Employment Law Group, P.C., a law firm that represents employees in disputes with their employers. Austin Szabo is a senior associate at the firm.