Emloyment Law Group - Law Firms - Whistleblower Lawyers
Live Chat Contact Us 24/7 Email US
Contact Us: Live Chat, Call, Email Chat email
Our Clients in Their
Own Words
Play Video: Whistleblower Attorney Testimonials | Wendell Carter
Previous Video
Next Video
THE EMPLOYMENT LAW GROUP®

Toll Free: 1-888-826-5260
Fax: 202-261-2835

inquiry@employmentlawgroup.com

Employment Law Group Addresses
The Employment Law Group,PC. BBB Business Review

Do You Need a Whistleblower Protection Act Lawyer?

Do You Need a Whistleblower Protection Act Lawyer?
  • Are you a federal employee who has been punished for acting as a whistleblower?

  • Have you uncovered fraud or other violations of federal laws, regulations, or rules?
  • Is your career in danger because you spoke out against wrongdoing?

The Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989 (WPA) forbids federal agencies from taking adverse personnel actions against federal employees who act as whistleblowers. Since the first days of the republic, exposing wrongdoing has been a duty of all government employees — and Congress has acted to protect the careers of those who do so. The WPA is now the primary tool for such protection: It prohibits the firing or demotion of whistleblowers, as well as other penalties such as blacklisting, reduction of pay, reassignment, or change in duties. If you've been punished for doing the right thing, the WPA can help to restore your government career.

Learn More

Important statutes in this area of law:

Notable TELG cases in this area of law:

  • Drake v. USAID

    This case established that a whistleblower under the Whistleblower Protection Act does not need to prove that he disclosed an actual violation of the law, but instead that he had a reasonable belief that there was a violation of a law, rule, or regulation.

The Employment Law Group® law firm is experienced in representing employees in WPA proceedings before the Office of Special Counsel (OSC), the Merit System Protection Board (MSPB), and federal courts. Several of our cases have broken new legal ground, helping to establish the WPA as a bulwark of workplace protection for federal employees.

In a case that helped to define the boundaries of the WPA, our firm’s attorneys obtained a landmark decision from the Federal Circuit, holding that whistleblowers need not prove that they’ve disclosed an actual violation: Instead, having a reasonable belief that there was wrongdoing is enough to trigger protection.

Under the WPA, a prevailing employee will be made whole, i.e., will be returned to the same position he or she would have been absent the retaliation. In particular, the WPA authorizes reinstatement, back pay for lost wages, compensatory damages, and litigation costs, including reasonable attorney fees.

As with all legal claims, deadlines are crucial. While the WPA itself does not have a deadline to file a claim, related provisions of federal law require federal employees to appeal any adverse actions to the MSPB within 45 days.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

What protection does the WPA offer to whistleblowers?

The Whistleblower Protection Act makes it illegal to fire or otherwise take adverse action against federal employees who engage in whistleblowing activities. The WPA provides a clear procedure for filing retaliation complaints. Whistleblowers who win their case may be reinstated with back pay or otherwise made whole at work, and also may receive attorney fees, other costs, and uncapped compensatory damages.

What sort of behavior is protected under the WPA?

Examples of whistleblower activities protected under the WPA include:

  • Cooperating with or disclosing information to an Inspector General or Special Counsel;
  • Refusing to obey an order that would violate law;
  • Testifying or lawfully assisting others exercise an appeal, complaint or grievance right; and
  • Exercising any appeal, complaint, or grievance right granted by any law, rule or regulation.

What sort of whistleblower retaliation is prohibited?

The WPA prohibits any action taken by an employer that has a negative or adverse impact on an employee’s terms, conditions, or privileges of employment. This includes:

  • Blacklisting
  • Demotion
  • Denial of benefits
  • Denial of overtime or promotion
  • Failure to hire or promote
  • Termination
  • Intimidation
  • Reductions in pay

What can whistleblowers recover?

Under the WPA, a prevailing employee will be made whole, i.e., will be returned to the same position he or she would have been absent the retaliation. In particular, the WPA authorizes:

  • Reinstatement
  • Back pay for lost wages
  • Compensatory damages
  • Litigation costs and attorney fees

How do I claim protection under the Whistleblower Protection Act?

Under the WPA, employees who believe they have been subjected to reprisal because of their protected disclosures may:

  1. state a claim with the Office of Special Counsel (OSC);
  2. pursue an individual right of action before the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB);
  3. appeal to the MSPB regarding an agency’s adverse action against the employee; or
  4. initiate a grievance proceeding pursuant to negotiated grievance procedures.

If a federal employee chooses to make a claim for whistleblower retaliation with the OSC, the OSC is obligated to investigate the allegations and make a decision within 240 days of receipt of a complaint as to whether there are reasonable grounds to believe that a prohibited personnel practice took place.

If the OSC renders an unfavorable decision, an employee can still seek relief by submitting his whistleblower reprisal case to the MSPB 60 days after the OSC closes their investigation or 120 days after filing a complaint with the OSC.

What standards must I meet to prevail under the Whistleblower Protection Act?

To be protected under the WPA, an employee must show by a preponderance of the evidence that:

  1. the employee made a protected whistleblowing disclosure; and
  2. a protected disclosure was a contributing factor in the agency’s adverse action.

The protected disclosure need not involve an actual violation of law; in a landmark decision in favor of a TELG client, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that it’s sufficient for a whistleblower to act on a reasonable belief that there was a violation of a law, rule, or regulation.

If an employee meets this burden, he or she can win the case unless the agency establishes by clear and convincing evidence that it would have taken the same adverse action in the absence of the protected whistleblowing disclosure.

Are federal whistleblowers protected by laws other than the WPA?

Primary protection comes from the Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989, along with the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 — plus follow-ons to both laws, including the No-FEAR Act of 2002 and the Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act of 2012. Government employees also are protected from retaliation by the First Amendment, within certain limits, and by Presidential Policy Directive 19, which President Obama signed in 2012.

Learn More

Important statutes in this area of law:

Notable TELG cases in this area of law:

  • Drake v. USAID

    This case established that a whistleblower under the Whistleblower Protection Act does not need to prove that he disclosed an actual violation of the law, but instead that he had a reasonable belief that there was a violation of a law, rule, or regulation.

greybar
blueline
facebook logo twitter logo google plus logo
Home  |  What We Do  |  Our Team  |  Our Clients  |  In The News  |  Resources  |  Contact Us


Our Locations: Washington, D.C. | San Francisco | Los Angeles

© 2017 The Employment Law Group, P.C. - All rights reserved.
Disclaimer | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy