Emloyment Law Group - Law Firms - Whistleblower Lawyers
Live Chat Contact Us 24/7 Email US
Contact Us: Live Chat, Call, Email Chat email



Use of this form does not establish an attorney-client relationship. As a next
step, you will hear from a client specialist.



Our Clients in Their
Own Words
Play Video: Whistleblower Attorney Testimonials | Wendell Carter
Previous Video
Next Video
THE EMPLOYMENT LAW GROUP®

Toll Free: 1-888-826-5260
Fax: 202-261-2835

inquiry@employmentlawgroup.com

Employment Law Group Addresses
The Employment Law Group,PC. BBB Business Review

Whistleblower Law Blog

TELG Attorney Quoted on CFO.com regarding Dodd-Frank Whistleblower Program

Share
The Employment Law Group® attorney Jason Zuckerman is quoted in an article titled Whistle-blower Debate Heats Up on CFO.com regarding the Securities and Exchange Commission’s proposed regulations for implementing the whistleblower provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act.  The Act requires the SEC to provide a monetary reward to whistle-blowers who voluntarily report original information leading to the recovery of more than $1 million from the accused companies.  Zuckerman compares the new whistleblower program to the highly successful qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act where a financial incentive helped the government recover over 28 billion dollars:

“The evidence is clear that providing a financial incentive for people to report corporate fraud has worked very well,” says Jason Zuckerman, a principal of The Employment Law Group®, which represents whistle-blowers.
Regarding a projected increase in tips, Zuckerman states:

. . . if you were to talk to people who lost their life savings to corporate fraud, “you would find it hard to argue that, if the SEC has to take some time to separate the wheat from the chaff, then this program is not worthwhile.”
Those opposed to the rules also see an issue with the Dodd-Frank Act allowing whistle-blowers to report allegations of fraud directly to the SEC.

To be eligible for protection under the whistleblower provisions in the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, [whistleblowers previously] have had to first inform their employers through internal compliance programs.
Zuckerman responds:

If a CEO is behind an illegal scheme to stimulate short-term profits, the company’s compliance program is unlikely to be effective, Zuckerman points out, and an internal “investigation” could include tampering with evidence or witnesses.
Most whistleblowers do not want to change careers and would readily report fraud through their employer’s compliance program if they believed their employer would not retaliate against them.  The whistleblower, not the employer, is in the best position to decide whether to report illegal activity directly to the SEC or through the employer’s compliance program.  Click here to learn more about the Dodd-frank Act.

Tagged: ,

decorative line
greybar
blueline
facebook logo twitter logo google plus logo
Home  |  What We Do  |  Our Team  |  Our Clients  |  In The News  |  Resources  |  Contact Us


Our Locations: Washington, D.C. | San Francisco | Los Angeles

© 2017 The Employment Law Group, P.C. - All rights reserved.
Disclaimer | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy