Stephen Amos v. District of Columbia, et al.

DISCLAIMER: Our firm's past results do not predict or guarantee future success. Each case is unique. Read more

In Brief

TELG client Stephen P. Amos prevailed on summary judgment, allowing him to take his whistleblower claims against the D.C. government to the jury.

Summary of Filed Complaint

TELG client Stephen P. Amos came to TELG when he was terminated following complaints to the OIG, FBI, and senior managers about corruption at the District of Columbia Department of Transportation.

What Happened in Court

TELG client Stephen P. Amos, a senior manager at DDOT, sued the District of Columbia for violations of his First Amendment rights and the D.C. Whistleblower Protection Act when he was terminated following complaints to the OIG, FBI, and senior managers about corruption at the District of Columbia Department of Transportation.  The District of Columbia moved for summary judgement, which the court denied, allowing Mr. Amos to present his claims to the jury.

Attorneys In This Case

Adam Augustine Carter
Adam Augustine Carter

R. Scott Oswald
R. Scott Oswald

Related Statutes: